Black and Arab supremacy: How did we allow racism against white people to spread?

 

Disclaimer: The author of this post condemns all misanthropic regimes, ideologies and concepts, whether they be Black nationalism, Black racism, Black power, Black supremacy, Arab supremacy, Arab racism, Islamism and its derivatives, including fundamentalist Islamism and Islamist terrorism, terrorist Zionism, the Black New World Order, Qaddafism, Assadism, Ruscism, Bolshevism, Sovietism, Nazism, Neo-Nazism, Third World Theory, far-right and far-left terrorism, Trumpism, Pan-Africanism, Pan-Arabism, Baathism, Islamofascism, Saddamism, Arab nationalism, Afrocentrism, Arab fascism, white supremacy, white racism, and so on. The author believes that people from any region can live in peace and coexistence regardless of race or ethnicity – be they Europeans and Asians, Indigenous peoples of the Americas and Americans and Latinos, Africans and Arabs.

Conceptualising ideologies of racial superiority: From marginalised groups to a systemic phenomenon

The current socio-political landscape of Western countries reveals the rapid spread of ideologies of black racism and black supremacy. These movements have evolved from isolated, marginal ‘cults’ into systemic movements aimed at dismantling traditional civilisation. Understanding these processes is critically important for assessing the risks of destabilisation in EU and NATO states, as they legitimise racial ‘revanchism’ under the guise of the ‘struggle for social justice’.

Deconstructing destructive organisations

Let us conduct a systematic analysis of the activities of several groups that exhibit a level of dehumanisation bordering on outright terror:

The institutionalisation of pseudoscience

One of the ideological foundations of these movements is the ‘Melanin theory’. This pseudoscientific concept attributes to melanin (which primarily functions merely as a pigment) the properties of a supernatural conduit for intellect and spiritual energy. These ideas have already penetrated the academic sphere, where they are used to legitimise racism and supplant rational science.

These ideologies lay the groundwork for the irreversible erosion of social cohesion, exacerbated by uncontrolled migration flows into the civilised member states of the EU and NATO.

Migration expansion and demographic reconfiguration in the Western world

Mass migration serves as a tool for demographic replacement and the spread of racist supremacist ideas, disregarding the principles of national sovereignty of Western nations. The concept of ‘The Great Replacement’, which was usually dismissed as mere conspiracy theory, is now being confirmed not only by statistics (as seen in the UK’s capital, London, where the proportion of white Britons has fallen to 23.9%, whilst the overall ‘white’ population stood at just 53%, even though as recently as 2001 the proportion of white Britons was over 50%), but also by the elites’ deliberate refusal to protect the indigenous population. For example, George Soros, through the Open Society Foundations, openly supported programmes to assist migrants (for instance, $500 million in 2016 for migrant-run businesses, and funding for NGOs working on migrant integration and rights). He publicly called on the EU to accept more migrants (300,000 per year), relax the rules and provide funding (≈€30 billion/year). Other billionaires and foundations took similar positions, emphasising the humanitarian and economic benefits.

The erosion of a nation’s sovereign rights

The modern pseudo-liberal paradigm has effectively abolished a nation’s right to determine the conditions for the admission of new members into its state. Yet, as one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, Governor Morris, noted, every society — from a great nation to a club — has the sovereign right to determine the composition of its own state. Ignoring this principle reduces state borders to a mere formality and citizenship to a devalued asset.

Islamisation and compromising on security

The process of Islamisation in Britain and EU countries has led to a ‘strategic capitulation’ on the part of Western leaders. In order to preserve the illusion of ‘mass tolerance’, the safety of women and Jewish communities is being sacrificed. In Britain, these groups have become the primary targets of pressure as a result of the erosion of free speech and the state’s inability to resist imported aggression.

You can read about the Islamization of Europe here, here, here, here and here.

The institutionalisation of DEI and the systematic marginalisation of the white population

DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) policies in the US corporate sector have become a mechanism for the forced redistribution of resources, where racial background takes precedence over professional qualifications.

Analysis of Bloomberg data on the S&P 100: Statistics from 2021 demonstrate the scale of targeted displacement:

These figures confirm that during restructuring, corporations are deliberately letting go of white employees to meet ideological quotas.

The culture of guilt and the decline of meritocracy

Under pressure from the ‘culture of guilt’ that intensified following the BLM protests, corporate giants (Amazon, Microsoft, Nike) have committed to artificially doubling the number of Black executives. This leads to institutional decline, as management positions are filled on the basis of ideological loyalty and racial characteristics rather than meritocratic principles. Some businesses, such as Sony, or the singer Billie Eilish, voiced openly racist views during the protests following the death of George Floyd, suggesting that no lives matter unless the lives of Black people matter.

Criminological decline and the paralysis of the justice system

The rise in crime, driven by an ideology of racial hatred towards white people, is met with silence from the mainstream media—and particularly from pseudo-liberal and pseudo-left-wing outlets—which serves as a tool of total control, something some communities refer to as the ‘dictatorship of political correctness’.

Psychological, genetic and cultural surrender, “Impotence of the West”

Western civilization is in a state of strategic extinction of will. This manifests itself both in sexual deviations and in geopolitical incapacity.

The Queen of Spades (QOS) and Hotwife phenomena are a clinical symptom of the loss of sovereignty over one’s demographic future. Voluntary refusal of white men from exclusivity in relationships in favor of dark-skinned migrants (”bulls”) is an extreme form of sociopolitical “cuckoldism”. Sexual deviance becomes a political symbol of the surrender of the entire white race.

The geopolitical inability of the West became evident after the fiasco in Afghanistan and the events of October 7 in Israel. The latest example is the situation in the Red Sea, where the Houthis effectively paralyzed world trade. NATO is unable to fight back effectively, while Chinese vessels pass unimpeded. Another example is the crisis in the Gulf of Hormuz, when almost alive Islamist Iran blocked the entire world trade by its own hands, which caused prices to rise all over the world. EU and NATO countries were never able to put an end to the Ayatollah’s regime, and the crisis was partially resolved only through negotiations. Another example is the inability of the EU and NATO countries to declare a full embargo against Ruscist Russia, which would allow the Ukrainians to quickly end its genocide. This shows the complete paralysis of the will of the Western countries.

Rational anti-Arabism

In this context, a prejudiced attitude towards migrants from underdeveloped countries, or even towards Arabs and Africans, or towards Muslims, given the dangerousness of such a religion as Islam (source 1, source 2), should be considered not as emotional hatred, but as a rational mechanism of self-preservation against low development (defense against low development). This is a natural reaction of the civilization’s immune system to an attempt to absorb its destructive elements.

The future of EU and NATO member states is possible under ideological dictates

The synthesis of data confirms that the theories of “The Great Replacement” (which is traditionally viewed exclusively as conspiracy theory) and “Black New World Order” (which everywhere tries to be called only “porno-kink”, despite its absolutely racist content) are an objective reality implemented through corporate quotas, migration pressure and the silencing of criminal degradation in regions with a large content of migrants. All of this is a systemic dismantling of state and corporate institutions through ideological corrosion, creating a security vacuum that is rapidly being filled by radical anti-Western movements.

5 critical consequences for Western civilization:

  1. Institutional Collapse: The Degradation of Technology and Governance Through the Prioritization of Racial Quotas over Intelligence.

  2. Demographic extinction: Expulsion of the indigenous population of states from all vital spheres of society.

  3. Economic exploitation: Directing resources to support migration groups at the expense of working citizens.

  4. Loss of will: The physical inability of NATO countries to defend their own territory and trade routes.

  5. Paralysis of justice: The creation of a caste of untouchables based on racial identity. Therefore, even criminals will be able to be unconvinced, solely because they are of a different race.

The only logical way to save the remnants of Western civilization is the immediate restoration of the principles of rational segregation, the protection of the indigenous population and the irrevocable rejection of the ideology of “mass tolerance”, which is an instrument of controlled self-destruction.

“Positive discrimination” and its impact on the professional environment; A point of critical institutional failure

The strategic danger for the collective West today lies not only in external threats, but in the deliberate dismantling of meritocracy, the foundation on which the technological and managerial superiority of the EU and NATO countries was built. Prioritization of ideological quotas (DEI) over professional competence leads to “management suicide”. When identity becomes more important than qualifications, the state and corporations lose their ability to survive in a competitive world.

According to a study by ResumeBuilder.com, ideological censorship in the HR sector of the US and Europe has reached a critical mass:

  • 48% of hiring managers admit to receiving direct instructions to prioritize diversity principles (DEI) over candidates’ actual qualifications.

  • 53% of managers live in constant fear of being fired if they don’t make enough “inclusive” hires, which paralyzes objective decision-making.

  • 70% of companies implement these initiatives solely “for the sake of visibility”, creating an ideological facade behind which the degradation of professional standards is hidden.

Key indicators of corporate erosion:

  • Intellectual vacuum: The deprioritization of white males (16% of cases) eliminates the most experienced demographic from key sectors.

  • “Ideological Dictatorship”: Fear of “cancellation culture” and fear of being called a racist forces management to sacrifice profits and safety for social points.

  • Loss of Competitiveness: The artificial lowering of entry standards in critical industries leaves the West vulnerable to the authoritarian kakistocracies of the East.

The internal degradation of the elites, who have voluntarily given up their will and intelligence, creates a managerial vacuum into which aggressive external ideologies (Black Racism, Black Supremacy, Black New World Order, Islamism; Islamic terrorism; Islamic fundamentalism; Islamofascism; Arab fascism; Jihadism; Antisemitism in the Arab world; Black supremacy; Black power; Black nationalism; Pan-Africanism, Gaddafism (Third International Theory), Nasserism, Takfir, Pan-Islamism etc.) penetrate.

The Genesis of Radicalism: From Black Power to Islamofascism in the Heart of Europe; Geopolitical risk rating: High strategic threat

Mass uncontrolled and illegal migration to EU and NATO member states became a Trojan horse that brought militant Islamism and the concepts of Black supremacy to the heart of Europe. These ideologies use the “colonial guilt” of the West as a weapon to paralyze the law enforcement system. Tolerating aggression under the guise of fighting “historical white racism” de facto legitimizes modern jihadism and radical anti-Semitism.

The concept of the Black New World Order, which was initially created, and is now actually hidden under the cover of “porno-kink”, in Europe is transformed into the creation of extraterritorial enclaves where state law does not apply. Using the guilt complex of European pseudo-liberals, radical groups claim a special status that allows them to ignore the laws of the host country.

Typology of radical ideologies: Declared goals vs. A real impact on the security of the EU and NATO

(According to the scheme: Ideology ⮕ Declared goal ⮕ Real impact on security)

  • Black Nationalism ⮕ “Fight against oppression” ⮕ Ethnic segregation, formation of paramilitary self-defense groups in cities.

  • Militant Islamism ⮕ “Religious Freedom” ⮕ Creation of parallel judicial structures (Sharia), terror, ideological expansion.

  • Pan-Africanism ⮕ “Unity of Nations” ⮕ Coordination of cross-border anti-state protests and logistics of illegal migration.

  • DEI Activism (SJW) ⮕ “Social Justice” ⮕ Paralysis of the will of intelligence agencies and the police due to fear of accusations of “systemic racism”.

This expansion was only possible because of a deep crisis and discrediting of masculinity and agency in Western society itself, which seems to have lost the instinct of self-preservation, especially among the pseudo-left and pseudo-liberal communities.

Cultural regression and “Impotence of the West”: Social dimension; Geopolitical risk rating: Civilization entropy

The process of “fading the West” manifests itself in creative, sexual and managerial sterility. Western man loses the role of the subject of history, which is visualized through sociocultural markers of identity erosion.

One of the many symbols of this degradation became the meme, which grows into a frank pseudo-culture “My wife’s boyfriend” (which is part of soyboy culture, from the category of similar dangerous pseudo-cultures / communities, some of which were formed, including around memes: Cock sucking contest, Whiteboy cuckold, Small Dick Energy, Big Dick Energy, Interracial cuckold, Queen Of Spades, hotwife, Rapefugees welcome!, Captain Sweden, My wife’s son, Whitebois, Sissy White Boys, BlackGuysOnly, SayNoToWhiteBoys, TeamInterracial, Sexwife, BBC whore, BBC slut, BBC Hotwife, etc.), which describes the type of man who voluntarily gave up the role of an adequate member of the family and community. This passivity becomes fatal against the background of the welcome aggression of radicalized migrants. In this context, the theory of “The Great Replacement” ceases to be a marginal conspiracy theory and becomes a mathematical description of reality: the indigenous population voluntarily renounces ethno-social responsibility.

One of the symptoms of this decay is “Natrashism” (Natashism), a term that appeared to describe a predominantly Russian “Natasha” who engages in sexual or romantic relationships with men of non-white appearance, primarily Turks, Arabs, Africans, Negroes, Caucasians, Central Asians, etc., usually cheating on her light-skinned husband, which is a rejection of ethnic and cultural solidarity that leads to the degradation of the gene pool and the destruction of traditional social ties.

Many modern men are no longer able to “be the head of the family” due to the lack of an “inner core”. They put up even with the presence of lovers in their wives, believing that this will help avoid divorce.

The loss of masculinity and adequate family hierarchy translates directly into physical danger on the streets, where the state can no longer guarantee the safety of women and children.

Black supremacy as a destroyer of family institutions

From our own analysis, we can say that the ideas of black supremacy (including through the ideas expressed in the concept of the Black New World Order) have as their purpose:

  • Every fair-skinned woman must have sex with a dark-skinned man, regardless of her own wishes.

  • Every woman must give birth to a dark-skinned child in order to increase the number of dark-skinned people in the world.

  • The discrediting of white people’s femininity and masculinity is mandatory.

  • Only a dark-skinned man has the right to be masculine, and this masculinity manifests itself exclusively within a patriarchal system.

  • A dark-skinned girl has the right to be feminine only if she is prepared to submit to the patriarchal system.

  • Cuckoldry and femininity are used exclusively as a sign of ‘weakness’ in the presence of dark-skinned people; however, even a dark-skinned woman faces the discrediting of her femininity, as she is equally capable of bearing a dark-skinned child, albeit with greater rights and self-respect than a light-skinned woman.

  • Consequently, the Black supremacy amounts to the complete discrediting of any masculinity and femininity.

  • A light-skinned man must either submit and be fully indoctrinated into feminisation and cuckoldry (as discussed above, in cultures such as ‘My wife’s boyfriend’, ‘soyboy culture’, Cock sucking contest, Whiteboy cuckold, Small Dick Energy, Interracial cuckold, My wife’s son, Whitebois, Sissy White Boys), or be eliminated, as his ability to be a masculine fair-skinned man or to reproduce must be destroyed.

Ultimately, this destroys all civilised family institutions – and replaces them with its own racist, marginalised and immoral ones; it will completely destroy the gene pool, and subsequently the entire ethnology of the European and American peoples, leading to the collapse of the Europoid race.

And it may seem that the concept is just a concept, and nothing terrible will happen, but we are already living through horrific events, as this has now taken on a hybrid form – the African and Arab populations, who couldn’t care less about civilisation, are having more and more children, and, driven by the goal and idea of black supremacy (and the concepts of this very ideology), are migrating to Europe in ever-greater numbers, displacing the fair-skinned population (London, which I wrote about above, and, for example, Belgium, are good examples), whilst pseudo -left and pseudo-liberal propaganda of excessive tolerance exploits the status of ‘former slaves’ and ‘whites guilty of horrific colonialism’ (and even going so far as to claim that white racism predates black racism, completely overlooking historical figures such as Jean-Jacques Dessalines (Jacques I), the first emperor of independent Haiti, who in the 18th and 19th centuries systematically exterminated Haiti’s light-skinned population (you can read more about it here); just as Marcus Garvey’s followers in Liberia plundered and enslaved the indigenous dark-skinned and light-skinned populations of Liberia), resulting in an attitude towards dark-skinned people that is almost to the point of treating them as untouchable, which allows such ideologies to spread unchecked.

Political cuckoldry

Political cuckoldry is collective masochism at the ethnic or state level, when whole peoples or societies derive a kind of “satisfaction” from their own humiliation and subjugation to outsiders. As well as individual pandering, where a man gets turned on by watching other men use his woman, the political option manifests itself in “guilty whites” kneeling to apologize to migrants, even if they are criminals, Europe feeding and harboring “savages”, and Israel continuing to supply Gaza even after the horrific massacre and genocide of Israelis on October 7, 2023. Examples from Ruscist Russia (the beating of a Russian girl by migrants and the inaction of the police) also vividly illustrate this phenomenon. According to Russian Zionist Andriy Zelev, the roots of this behavior go back to primitive times, when submission to the “alpha males” helped the pack to survive. Today, the main reason is total degradation, mental retardation and oligophrenia caused by Soviet selective breeding, marriages between close relatives, drugs, sexist version of feminism, alcohol and wars. The West is weakening and, not having the strength to resist stronger and more aggressive peoples, begins to ignore its own replacement, and some pseudo-left and pseudo-liberal activists even “get off on” from their replacement. Israel’s experience shows that even after a terrible tragedy, nothing fundamentally changes: society prefers the principle “Après moi, le déluge”, typical of a dying civilization.

Criminal Records and Public Safety: Implications of the Open Door Policy; Geopolitical Risk Rating: Homeland Security Collapse

The “ideological intoxication” of governments under the influence of pseudo-leftist dogmas has led to the virtual impossibility of deporting even dangerous criminal elements. The impunity of criminals hiding under the status of “victims of the system” fuels their confidence in their own “superiority” over the “weak” West.

Geography and typology of crimes based on racial/religious aggression (data from the Russian propaganda publication EADaily):

  • Berlin (2020): A 21-year-old migrant from Kenya grabbed a 5-month-old baby from a stroller for no apparent reason and threw her under the wheels of cars on the road.

  • Frankfurt am Main (2019): a 40-year-old refugee from Eritrea pushed a mother and child under a train; An 8-year-old boy died on the spot.

  • Wuppertal (2018): A migrant from India grabbed a 5-year-old German citizen at a train station and jumped onto the tracks in front of an oncoming train.

These are not isolated cases of insanity, but a systemic sign of disregard for Western law enforcement agencies, which are ideologically prohibited from using adequate force against people of other races.

Geopolitical consequences: Pogroms in Europe and international impotence; Geopolitical risk rating: Asymmetric internal destabilization

The events of 2025 marked the culmination of a fusion of pseudo-left activism and Islamist radicalism. Street wars in key EU hubs demonstrated a complete loss of control on the part of national governments.

The phenomenon of “Free Palestinians” (who often do not even know their “ideology”), the majority of whom are Africans and Arabs, who destroy European cities, is a classic example of asymmetric warfare. In September 2025, in Milan, a mob stormed the central station, injuring 60 police officers. In Barcelona, ​​the march of 70,000 people ended with large-scale pogroms of shops. This destabilization of NATO’s rear directly supports the foreign trade war. While the Houthis (in apparent collusion with Beijing, i.e. the dictatorial government of the hegemon of the People’s Republic of China) are paralyzing traffic in the Red Sea, European radicals are wreaking havoc inside EU logistics hubs. The main beneficiary is the People’s Republic of China, whose trade routes remain secure while the West absorbs domestic fire.

For example, in March 2026, the anti-Semitic and probably Islamist terrorist group “The Earthquake Faction” set fire to the Czech industrial facility of the Czech LPP Holding, which, as the “Free Palestinians” believed, was engaged in sending weapons to Israel through its cooperation with the Israeli company Elbit Systems. There was massive rejoicing on the Internet about this in the Palestineophile environment. However, this company also produced weapons that Ukraine uses to defend itself against Russian invasion. And as it turned out later, terrorists completely destroyed the production of thermal imagers of the Ukrainian company “Archer”, and not Czech drones, as they believed. The same happened in June 2025, when 150 activists of the “Stop arming Israel” movement broke into the territory of the private defense enterprise OIP in Tours and damaged military equipment that was being prepared for shipment to Ukraine. In Finland, in March 2026, two people set fire to the premises of volunteers who helped the Armed Forces.

Sources from news publications on this matter:

A possible projected scenario for the future:

  • Emergence of extralegal autonomous zones: Final loss of municipal control over urban enclaves, especially ghettos, where power will pass to religious and racist councils.

  • Collapse of the administrative vertical: The police will finally abandon forceful enforcement due to fear of prosecution for “racism”.

  • Logistics paralysis: Constant unrest and ideological strikes will make internal EU logistics more expensive than transoceanic transport of the People’s Republic of China.

The role of Ruscist Russia and the alliances “Union State“, “Shanghai Cooperation Organisation”, “Commonwealth of Independent States”, “Collective Security Treaty Organization”, “Eurasian Economic Union”, “Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union”, “BRICS”, “Axis of Resistance”, “Commonwealth of Unrecognized States“

There is real evidence of the weaponized / coercive engineered migration: Russia (often through Belarus as a proxy) deliberately provokes migration crises on the EU’s eastern borders to sow chaos, distract from the war against Ukraine, take revenge on countries for generally justly imposed sanctions, support Ukraine in defense against Russia, and weaken NATO. (Source 1, Source 2, Source 3)

In 2021, there was a crisis on the Polish-Belarusian border — the Lukashist regime (in coordination with Moscow) massively imported migrants from the Middle East, Africa, and Iraq/Syria, promising an “easy path” to the EU. Migrants were used as “human ammunition”. Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia recognized this as a hybrid attack.

In 2023–2025, a similar situation occurred on the border of Ruscist Russia with Finland and Estonia — a sharp increase in non-European migrants (from Syria, Somalia, Iraq). FRONTEX recorded +200% on eastern routes precisely during the Russian offensive on Ukraine or the introduction of sanctions against the racist regime. Russia and Belarus (Union State) deprived migrants of their documents and sent them to the borders.

The goal was later defined as: destabilizing, strengthening anti-migrant sentiments, weakening EU/NATO unity. Russia publicly positions itself as a “defender of traditional values” against “Western multiculturalism and Islamization” (through its own propaganda media), but in practice it creates crises. Meanwhile, in Russia itself, Muslims have a more privileged status than Russians, the American journalist and author of the media “UnderFire.News” Joe Lindsley studied this issue well in his social networks. This is a classic hybrid tactic. Although Russia itself is a victim of Islamic terrorism (ISIL attacks in Dagestan, Moscow, etc.) and is fighting against it inside the country.

Despite the fact that Russia itself is fighting jihadism in the North Caucasus and Syria, it supports Islamist regimes such as Assadism in Syria or the Ayatollah in Iran.

Historically, the USSR supported Arab regimes against Israel, sowing both anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism in its propaganda, the modern Ruscist Russian Federation supports Palestine (including Islamist terrorist groups from the “Palestinian Joint Operations Room”) and Iran, together in the Axis of Resistance. Anti-Semitism in the Arab world has its roots in Islam, the Nazi influence of the 1930s and 1940s, and independent factors. (Source 1, Source 2)

Historically, the USSR supported pan-Africanism and black nationalism in Africa for, according to the version of Soviet propaganda, the anti-colonial struggle, but in fact only for the sake of expanding its own influence. Today, the Russian Federation conducts “anti-colonial” propaganda in Africa against the West, uses PMC Wagner and Africa Corps for influence, amplifies racial conflicts through the bot farm of trolls, so, for example, the ruscist Internet Research Agency in 2016-2020 promoted the topic of BLM in the USA. Russia also actively supports military juntas in Africa (Assimi Goïta in Mali, Ibrahim Traoré in Burkina Faso, National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland and M62 Movement in Niger, CAPSAT in Madagascar, Dinis Incanha and Horta Inta-A Na Man in Guinea-Bissau), which are ideologues of black supremacy and openly hostile to light-skinned people and Europeans.

Russia is waging a hybrid war against the EU and NATO, including instrumentalizing migration (from Muslim countries too) to weaken the West and create internal conflicts — while publicly playing the role of “against non-traditional values ​​and migration.”

Russia regularly recruits mercenaries from Africa (particularly from countries ruled by Russophile and pro-PRC military juntas that fully support Ruscist Russia), the Middle East and South Asia, and is waging a war of extermination against light-skinned people, destroying Ukrainians and planning to destroy other ethnic groups in Europe, the vast majority of whom are light-skinned and Europoids, unless Ukrainians stop Russia on their own soil.

On 23 February 2026, Magnus Brunner, the European Commissioner for Migration, stated that Vladimir Putin is effectively the ‘main driving force’ behind migration to Europe due to his role in fuelling conflicts over the past decade. Brunner stated that Putin is always involved in such large migration flows and that it is always Vladimir Putin. At that time, the EU feared a wave of migration due to the war in Iran. And there is a grain of truth in this, as The Moscow Times noted, because the EU received its first wave of migrants following the wars that began after the Arab Spring and the Arab Winter, and at that time, Ruscist Russia sided with repressive Islamist regimes and only fuelled the wars further, leading to a flow of migrants into the EU. The second wave, however, was started by Ruscist’s Russia itself – by attacking Ukraine in 2014, and then in 2022 expanding its invasion into a full-scale one, forcing Ukrainians to flee from genocide and the crimes of Ruscists to EU countries. (source 1) (source 2) (source 3)

In July 2025, according to Czech intelligence, it emerged that Russia was recruiting migrants (presumably Africans, Arabs and South Asians) to carry out acts of sabotage and terrorism against the EU. (source 1) (source 2) (source 3)

On 25 August 2025, TVP World reported that Russia continues to use its dominion-protectorate Belarus as a staging ground for its weaponised migration, flooding Poland with illegal migrants from the Middle East in order to both destabilise the EU and gain support for far-right political parties. (source 1) (source 2)

On 7 May 2024, the Ukrainian Centre for Strategic Communications and Information Security “SPRAVDI” reported that the Russians are no longer relying solely on Middle Eastern and African migrants as part of their weaponised migration strategy. The Russians are now forcing Ukrainians from the occupied territories to participate in their attempts to create a migration crisis. They reported this based on information that the SBU has revealed that Russia’s puppet “leaders” of the occupying “Russian Ministry of Defence in the Zaporizhzhia region” have been organising the forced removal of residents to the Rostov Oblast, and then to Russia’s north-western border with Latvia. The Russians forced people to walk to Latvian border posts under the guise of refugees seeking entry to the EU. In the event of refusal, the victims are threatened with being shot and with reprisals against their close relatives who remained in the occupied territories. In this way, the occupiers are attempting to create artificial migration-related tension in EU countries and gain public support for far-right causes with which Russia is aligned. (source 1) (source 2) (source 3)

The absolute decline of the indigenous population of Europe

In the EU, the death rate has exceeded the birth rate for more than 10 years. For example, in 2024, ≈ 3.56 million were born, ≈ 4.82 million died, of which ≈ -1.3 million were natural declines. The growth of the EU population is currently provided mainly by immigration. The objective challenges in the EU with migration, which are called by researchers, are the aging of the native population of the EU, problems of integration of migrants, cultural and social conflicts between migrants and native inhabitants and uneven settlement (from which ghettos are formed).

In more detail:

The total fertility rate (TFR) in the EU in 2024 was 1.34 children per woman (according to Eurostat data in March 2026). This is significantly below the population replacement level (≈2.1 without migration). In 2023 — 1.38, in previous years — about 1.4–1.5. In most EU countries, the TFR is <1.6 (Spain, Italy, Malta — is about 1.0–1.2; France — relatively higher, about 1.66). A similar “trend” has been going on since the 1960s and 1970s due to, according to the researchers, “urbanization, women’s education, career priorities, high housing/child costs, and cultural changes,” and, often overlooked by researchers, the heavy influence of propaganda that tries, roughly speaking, to “indoctrinate women to Karen, to discredit in every way the subject of sex between a man and a woman, to discredit the positive image of the father, in in some of the most radical manifestations, “showing attention to a woman began to be compared with rape”. The population of the EU is aging: the median age of native inhabitants is about 45 years (2025).

Migration from Africa, the Middle East, and North Africa (many of whom are ethnically Arab, Berber, sub-Saharan African) is accompanied by a higher TFR at baseline. If taken globally: in sub-Saharan Africa it is ≈4.0–5.0 (in some countries >6), in the Middle East and North Africa it is 2.5–3.5 (in 2024, according to UN World Population Prospects).

In Europe, the TFR of foreign-born women is higher than that of native-born women (eg in England and Wales 2021: 2.03 foreign-born vs 1.54 UK-born). The share of children of foreign-born mothers in the EU is 23–24% (2023–2024), in some countries it is different: in Luxembourg — 68%, Austria, Belgium, Germany, Spain — >33%.

Over time, the TFR of migrants often declines to the level of the host country (due to “assimilation, education, urbanization”), but the second and third generations retain higher rates in some groups (eg, Muslim communities). Pew Research (2017) writes that Muslims in Europe had a TFR of ≈2.6 vs 1.6 of non-Muslims; they are 13 years younger on average.

In 2024, 4.2 million immigrants from countries outside the EU arrived in the EU (Eurostat). Net migration compensates for natural decline and ensures population growth. In 2022–2024, the peaks were higher (up to 5–6 million gross inflows in some years). The main sources of migration are from the Middle East, Africa and Asia (mainly South Asia). Foreign-born people make up ≈10.4% of the EU population (46.7 million from non-EU countries by 2025). Foreign citizens make up ≈6.8%. Migration from non-EU countries dominates over intra-EU ones.

The situation has been brought to the point that without migration, the population of the EU will decrease. At current levels, the EU’s population will stabilize or grow slightly, but the ethnic composition of countries is changing. According to BBVA Research (2026), immigrants (younger, higher labor force participation) compensate for the decline of the native working-age population, providing ≈40% of GDP growth in 2022–2025, while for the native population “no jobs are found”.

The Muslim population (often from relevant regions), according to Pew data for 2017 (projections to 2050), will grow from 7.4% to 11–14%, depending on the scenario.

Many business elites and organizations (including EU politicians) support migration to fill labor shortages, improve pensions and grow the economy. Immigrants are younger and more likely to work in sectors with a shortage of personnel (IT, care, construction, agriculture). Eurostat and OECD note that without migration the labor force would have declined more.

George Soros, through the Open Society Foundations, openly supported programs to help migrants (for example, $500 million in 2016 for migrant businesses, NGO funding for integration and migrant rights). He publicly called on the EU to accept more (300,000 per year), loosen rules and finance (≈€30 billion/year). Similar positions were taken by other billionaires and foundations, emphasizing humanitarian and economic benefits.

At the beginning of 2025, in Norway, one of the most progressive countries in the world, about 17.3% of the population are immigrants, and another 4.1% are born in Norway to immigrant parents. The share of people with origins in Africa is about 2.7%, and from Asia is 6.3% of the entire population. Among the African communities, a significant part has roots in Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia - they are mostly refugees or their descendants. Syrians (mostly of Arab origin) made up approximately 0.64% of the population as of 2019.

At that time, the EU states concluded global pacts on migration, quotas, agreements with Turkey and Libya.

A simple example is that Africans and Arabs are treated with a “special judicial system” and receive less punishment than light-skinned people

Relatively recently, there was a case when an Eritrean migrant, Yazied Mohamed, raped a 16-year-old child, Meya Åberg.

The prosecutor demanded that he be deported back, but the court refused and stated that it was not an “extremely serious crime” and “does not pose a serious threat to public order or security”, in particular “given the “nature and duration of the incident”, which the media would then interpret as saying that the rape “wasn’t long enough” for the court, which they are generally right about.

The court sentenced him to 3 (!) years in prison and ordered him to pay compensation to the victim (approximately SEK 240,000)

Judging by the lack of further coverage, the decision has not changed, and in 3 years (and since this story is from September 2024, it is already much less) the Eritrean migrant will be released again

Someone can say that this is a story about the incompetence of the court, and not about the influence, let’s call it the “innocence of migrants, because it is socio-economic factors”, then there are many stories during the same years when ethnic Swedes received much more punishment:

Unnamed man, 5.5 years in prison, 370,000 kroner in compensation: https://swedenherald.com/article/mans-sentence-increased-for-18-child-rape-convictions-in-sweden

Fredrik Lundgren (”Nytorgsmannen”), 4 years in prison: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/hovratten-lindrar-straffet-for-nytorgsmannen-doms-till-fyra-ars-fangelse

Two unnamed men, both 5.5 years in prison: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/vast/kvinna-lurades-in-i-bil-tva-man-doms-for-grov-valdtakt

Unnamed man, 5.9 years in prison: https://www.expressen.se/noje/tv-man-valdtog-sin-styvdotter-far-sankt-straff

“Hemtjänst/äldreomsorg” workers, 3.2-5.5 years in prison: https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/sverige/de-ar-mannen-som-valdtar-i-aldrevarden

Sources:

  • https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/not-serious-enough-swedish-court-refuses-to-deport-migrant-who-raped-16-year-old-cites-duration-of-offence/articleshow/124803396.cms

  • https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/sweden-allows-rape-convict-to-stay-in-country-no-to-deportation-as-crime-wasnt-long-enough-donald-trump-jr-reacts-9513411

  • https://derechadiario.com.ar/us/argentina/scandal-sweden-court-will-not-deport-the-refugee-who-raped-a-minor-because-it-did-not-last-long-enough

  • https://derechadiario.com.ar/us/argentina/scandal-sweden-court-will-not-deport-the-refugee-who-raped-a-minor-because-it-did-not-last-long-enough

  • https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b2c3eddb088191800a9ec08fd1cfc3

  • https://x.com/i/grok/share/6b196e88f6a842fa98f5ee995a72deed

  • https://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/megane-a-ete-reduite-au-rang-dobjet-30-ans-de-reclusion-criminelle-pour-le-viol-barbare-de-cherbourg-12-03-2026-ETVRK7ECBBGV3KI7VPSELLRWEQ.php?fbclid=PAY2xjawQidR5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA81NjcwNjczNDMzNTI0MjcAAae2wzGOafuEG5VDXqlpcZNA_nHzLgX-6cf6oojXb647fYP6BWQfKb4ZhZY32g_aem_aznRGolP1Lnb-QPhWPSCEg

  • https://x.com/i/grok/share/142e37a245da470990f845311e86545c

  • https://x.com/i/grok/share/c8dbe23b58b34fdebd2ffcdcb522d986

Jews: victims or organizers?

Part of the far-right-wing radical and conspiracy theories (especially around the concept of the “Great Replacement”) is the claim that Jewish elites facilitate migration and demographic change. Anti-defamation and academic sources note that in extremist circles, Jews are often accused of “controlling politics, the media and immigration.” Reports of anti-Semitism explicitly note that such ideas are common conspiracy motifs, such as claims of “Jewish control of migration”.

In modern times, a significant part of Jews avoids public places and considers emigration because of the danger. Physical attacks, threats, vandalism against Jews are recorded. Jewish communities in Europe and Britain reported “feeling under siege”

Research shows that it is anti-Semitism from various directions: far-right-wing radical ideologies, part of far-left-wing radical (especially pseudo-left) discourse, Islamist extremism.

Anti-Semitic rhetoric was recorded in racist black nationalist movements at one time - Jews were depicted as “exploiters” or “obstacle to progress”. Since the 1960s, racist activists (such as those associated with the Nation of Islam) have promoted anti-Semitic ideas. In some forms of Pan-Africanism, it has been clearly documented that anti-Israel narratives cross into anti-Semitism.

And despite the fact that in many anti-racist online communities (such as the Save Europe communities), Jews are usually portrayed as the instigators or simply as those responsible for the preferential treatment of Arabs and Black people in Europe and America, in reality, Jews suffer just as much, apart from global anti-Semitism, which has been successfully propagated (and for which the super-rich have clearly allocated substantial funds, given how internet -users now consider Jews, Israel and Zionism to be responsible for all the world’s problems) from Arab racism, which usually manifests itself in ideologies such as Islamism or Islamic fundamentalism. You can read more about Arab supremacy right here.

Light-skinned young people no longer meet their peers

As a result of the implanted pseudo-liberal ideology with the cult of excessive tolerance for races other than one’s own, discrediting masculinity, instilling misandrist ideals and instilling hatred for one’s own country (the country itself, not the state and not the government), race and ethnicity, and all this under the influence of Islamist and black racist ideologies that aim to destroy the communities of EU and NATO member states from the inside, what do we have?

Not so long ago, an opinion piece from The Telegraph was published. They write the following. Gender polarization in the USA and Great Britain is growing, this is confirmed by independent sources: young women are becoming more “washed” by pseudo-left ideas and critical of men, young men are relatively more conservative. The article gives the numbers: only 38% of men have a very positive attitude towards women, while only 18% of women have a very positive attitude towards men. There is independent evidence that interest in older women is growing and 64% of men are looking for older partners. There is an obvious increase in negative attitudes towards men. Young women are more pessimistic about the economy, work, housing.

Many other factors influence this, social network algorithms directly form polarization, the porn industry and other online contact strongly distort expectations, dating apps work exclusively on “market logic”, and not on real love and acquaintances.

Banal poverty of the population is also a huge factor. The light-skinned population is not ready to give birth to children, because they seriously worry about both their own and the future of their children, and the unstable situation in their states does not allow them to make this important decision, since all the money is accumulated by the rich, and the hybrid dictatorship of the rich keeps other people (say, from a lower class than them) in poverty. We analyzed this in our other article. While Arabs and Africans mostly do not care about all these factors, they give birth to as many children as possible in their misogynistic patriarchal community without thinking about the consequences, and then these same children will populate progressive countries and displace the indigenous population.

Black racism and DEI are displacing white men, Migration, The Great Replacement and Islamization are destroying the West. “Political cuckoldry”, popularization of individual cuckoldry as well, popularization of “Queen of Spades”, loss of masculinity as surrender. DEI reduces meritocracy, paralyzes justice, demographically replaces whites.

The “cult of guilt” (which has especially intensified since BLM) reinforces anti-male narratives in pseudo-leftist discourse (”men are trash”, defining patriarchy as exclusively white/male). Some pseudo-left feminist currents intersect with identity politics where men (especially white) are portrayed as privileged/toxic. This could radicalize some young women, making them “angry” and less open to relationships.

DEI and migration create a sense of instability/loss of control, this increases pessimism in women about the future and security and a reaction in men (seeking “safer” partners).

Loss of masculinity, cuckoldism and soyboy culture are symptoms of surrender. The Telegraph article sees male adaptation (to cougars) as a rational response to the “toxicity” of female peers.

The low birth rate is the result of both population replacement and pseudo-left and pseudo-liberal propaganda. It is also a consequence of cultural factors (anti-romantic attitudes of women).

Dry statistics: Arabs, Africans, blacks and people from Africa, the Middle East and South Asia commit more crimes than Europoid and Americans

The share of foreigners in prisons is approximately 34%, although they are not the majority of the population. Africans had ~153.8 crimes per 1,000 people, above average compared to Norwegians; ~117.4 crimes were registered per 1000 Asians (including Turks), compared to Norwegians, this is above average; Only ~98.4 crimes are registered per 1,000 Europeans, which is close to the average compared to Norwegians, and ~44.9 per 1,000 Norwegians.

Immigrants are more likely to have lower employment rates and lower average incomes than non-immigrant populations.

In 2023, there were a total of 380,000 illegal border crossings in Europe, and this includes data from EU member states and Norway in the context of the overall flow. Norway recorded around 6,000 illegal crossings from Russia in 2015, prompting changes in its control policy. In 2010-2013, immigrants from Africa and Asia committed the most crimes among all migrants.

Young men from Iraq and Somalia had up to ~1,200 accusations per 1,000 (all types of offenses) between 2020 and 2023 in some studies/reports. Refugees or short-stayers are more likely to have lower levels of employment and resources, which correlates with crime in social studies.

In the US, African Americans make up about 13% of the population, but make up about 37% of the prison population. This indicates a significant racial disparity in the criminal justice system.

According to Statistics Denmark, men of Moroccan origin have higher crime rates compared to the national average. For example, the descendants of Moroccan immigrants have a crime index of 305, compared to an average of 100 for the general population. Even after adjusting for age and socioeconomic status, this index remains high.

In 2018, a Swedish television investigation found that 58% of those convicted of rape or attempted rape were of foreign origin, of which 40% were from the Middle East and Africa.

In 2020, 28% of those convicted of criminal offenses in Belgium were foreigners, although they represented only 13% of the population. Most of them were citizens of Morocco, Turkey and Algeria.

Dark-skinned in the US (~13%) are often vastly overrepresented in arrest and felony statistics—specifically, murders actually have a higher per capita rate for this group, sometimes 8 times higher than whites. About 89-93% of black homicides involve black victims and perpetrators, and 80-84% involve whites.

There are reports that immigrants may be overrepresented in criminal statistics in the EU.

Denmark (Statistics Denmark, Ministry of Justice, 2023–2024): Non-Western immigrants and their descendants (about 10–11% of the population) commit ~30% of violent crimes and ~32% of rapes. Men of non-Western origin have 2-4 times higher criminal conviction rates than Danes. For certain groups (MENAPT - Middle East, North Africa) the figures are even higher. In total, 83% of crimes are committed by persons of Danish origin, but taking into account the share of the population, non-Western groups are greatly outnumbered.

Sweden (Brå - National Crime Prevention Council, 2021-2024 data): Persons of foreign origin (born abroad or with two foreign parents, ~26-33% of the population) - 58% of crime suspects, 73% of murder/attempted murder, 70% of robbery. The relative risk for those born abroad is 2.5 times higher, for the second generation it is up to 3.2 times higher compared to native Swedes. The highest rates are among groups from Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, and North Africa.

Germany (BKA - Federal Criminal Police, PKS 2024): Foreign nationals (15-16% of the population) - ~34-40% of suspects in crimes, including violent ones. Syrians and Afghans are 10-16 times more likely to be suspected of violent crimes than Germans. Temporary migrants/asylum seekers (3–4% of the population) — 8.8% of suspects. North African groups (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia) have much higher rates.

The Netherlands (CBS - Central Bureau of Statistics): People of non-Western migration origin have 2-6 times higher rates of criminal suspicion compared to native Dutch people (depending on group and generation). The highest among Moroccans, Antilleans, and Surinamese. The general trend: the excess persists even after adjusting for age and sex.

France: Foreigners (non-European, ~5–8% of the population) — 17–48% of suspects in certain crimes (up to 48% in Paris). African groups (Maghreb + Sub-Saharan) are much higher in statistics in vehicle theft, robbery, sexual violence (up to 8-17 times relative to the demographic share).

Great Britain (Ministry of Justice, 2022–2024): Blacks have 20.4 arrests per 1,000 people compared to 9.4 for whites. Excesses in arrests and prison populations for black and some Asian (mostly Pakistani) groups. Arabs have lower arrest rates, but in general non-white groups are outnumbered at certain stages of the justice system.

US: FBI/UCR and BJS (2023): Black Americans (~13-14% of population) - ~50-55% of homicide arrests, high percentage of violent crimes. Immigrants from Latin America and Africa show mixed results, but in general immigrants (first generation) often have lower rates of incarceration than natives, although second generations and certain subgroups (from Central America) have higher rates.

In Germany, immigrants from underdeveloped countries live in more crime-prone areas.

In Europe, citizenship is often counted, not ethnicity, the second generation of migrants is already recorded as “local”, and illegal migrants may not be considered in the population, due to which crime statistics among them often decrease.

Cradle of Genocide of light-skinned people and Christians: the Republic of South Africa

As far back as 1993, one of the boldest, most truthful and most principled Russian and Soviet opposition figures, as well as a linguist, author, publicist, journalist, human rights activist, co-founder and member of the ‘Democratic Union’ and ‘Western Choice’ parties, Valeriya Novodvorskaya, warned:

Apartheid is perfectly normal. South Africa will yet see what kind of regime will be established by the indigenous majority, who are entertaining themselves with arson, murder and violence. It won’t seem like much... Civil rights exist for people who are educated, well-fed, well-mannered and level-headed. In the zone, things are much more out in the open. There are rights for everyone there, except for the ‘degraded’ and the ‘cocks’. And the issue here is not one of physiology, but of strength of spirit, of moral standing. The pathetic, the spiritually bankrupt, the cowards sleep by the toilet and have no rights whatsoever. If such people were given rights, the general standard of humanity would be lowered. So apartheid is the truth, and so-called universal human rights are a lie.

It is well known that following the colonisation of South Africa, the dark-skinned population was often treated ‘poorly’ in every respect. Consequently, within the Union of South Africa, separate territories—reserves—were set aside for black people. They were only permitted to leave these areas with authorisation. In short, this was a typical policy of segregation and apartheid. The principles of racial segregation were enshrined in law in 1948 under the rule of the National Party, which had sympathised with Nazi Germany during the Second World War. White settlers (mainly Boers) had previously fought against the British in the Anglo-Boer War and refused to accept defeat. As a result, the international community, including the Soviet Union, began to put pressure on South Africa. It was isolated, and apartheid was declared a crime against humanity. Despite this, the country’s economy developed, and cities and infrastructure were built. Over time, the light-skinned population, which essentially formed the core of the workforce, began to leave, partly due to racism directed against them by the dark-skinned population. The black population grew rapidly. In the 1990s, all restrictions on them were lifted. The dark-skinned population moved en masse to the cities. This led to the spread of AIDS, a rise in crime and the collapse of the previous social order. Now there are fewer than one in ten white people for every black person in the country. Light-skinned people are forced to live in ‘houses behind high fences topped with electrified barbed wire’. Venturing beyond the secured perimeter often risks murder for men and rape for women. In South Africa, there is a belief among the black population that having sex with a white woman cures HIV. It is estimated that around 10% of South Africa’s black population is infected with HIV.

In South Africa, the situation has reached the systematic extermination of white farmers (”white genocide” or “plaasmoorde” as ethnic cleansing). There is a real problem of extremely violent farm attacks with high levels of violence, a disproportionately high risk to white farmers compared to their share of the population, inflammatory rhetoric from politicians, and demographic pressure on the white minority.

According to AfriForum (an organization of Afrikaners that conducts its own monitoring based on police, media and testimony) about 49-54 killings on farms in 2023, similar numbers in previous years (50-70 annually on average for the last decade). TAU SA (farmers’ union) gives similar estimates: ~635 murders 2014-2024. The SAPS (South African Police) records 46-62 farm/smallholder murders annually in certain years, but their “rural safety” category is less detailed. Overall, farm murders are 0.2-0.4% of the total number of murders in South Africa (27,000+ per year).

Historically (since the 1990s), the vast majority of farmers/owners killed are white (about 87-90% according to old ISS and Africa Check data). Whites make up ~7-8% of South Africa’s population, but they are the majority of commercial farmers because of the legacy of apartheid. It was only in 2024-2025 that government SAPS reports began to highlight that in specific quarters the majority of those killed on farms were black workers or new black farmers (for example, in Q1 2025, 5 out of 6 murders were black). This is used to refute the “racial” character. However, critics (AfriForum) point out that the attacks are often extremely brutal (torture, rape, killing of entire families), even if the motive is robbery.

Some estimates (based on TAU/AfriForum and white farmer numbers of 30-50k farms) give a farmer homicide rate of 50-100+ per 100,000 — 2-4 times the national average (34-45 per 100,000). In some provinces (eastern) it is even higher. Other analysts (ISS, government) say that farms are simply rich and isolated targets for ordinary crime, and that the overall level of violence in South Africa is one of the highest in the world. There is no conclusive evidence that farmers kill less than others; the disparity exists, especially considering torture.

The song/slogan “Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer” (Dubul’ ibhunu) is regularly sung in support of Julius Malema (leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters, the third largest party) at rallies. The South African Court (Equality Court) in 2022-2023 recognized that “in the context of the struggle against apartheid, this is not hate speech and not a call to violence.” Cyril Ramaphosa’s government defends this as “freedom of speech” and “historical context” rather than politics. Critics (including the opposition Democratic Alliance party and AfriForum) see it as inflammatory rhetoric that creates an atmosphere of impunity. Malema openly sings this in 2023-2025 as well.

The white population of South Africa has decreased from ~13-16% in the 1990s to ~7% now due to emigration (hundreds of thousands left due to crime and the burden on the infrastructure, BEE — Black Economic Empowerment). Many Afrikaners are Christians (Reformed churches, etc.), so attacks on farms are often seen as a blow to the Christian community.

In Zimbabwe, however, it was the country’s second president—a lifelong dictator, human rights abuser and corrupt official of independent Zimbabwe—who was most responsible for the genocide of light-skinned people, and he made statements such as:

In this country, white people are second-class citizens. The only white person you can trust is a dead one.

In the 1960s, during the pan-African decolonisation process, the light-skinned minority population of Zimbabwe (a territory which, incidentally, was rich in minerals and gold) declared independence from Britain, establishing the state of Rhodesia. London did not recognise this independence and demanded that power be handed over to the dark-skinned majority. Despite sanctions, Rhodesia developed its agriculture thanks to its light-skinned population and trade with South Africa. The country waged war against pro-communist rebels supported by the Soviet Union and China. The white population successfully held its ground until the late 1970s, and the state of Rhodesia was first renamed the Republic of Rhodesia, and then Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. Elections were held in 1980. Light-skinned people made up only 5% of the population (around 200,000 people), so the radical dark-skinned forces led by Robert Mugabe won. People with very poor administrative skills came to power. The economy began to deteriorate rapidly. Instead of implementing reforms, Mugabe blamed all the problems on white farmers. ‘Land reform’ began — land was seized from whites without compensation. Those who resisted were killed. Most white farmers were forced to leave the country. Due to a sharp reduction in cultivated land and a fall in productivity, the economy completely collapsed between 2001 and 2008. Public debt reached 131% of GDP, and inflation hit 231,000,000%. Zimbabwe abandoned its own currency. The country has gone from being a food exporter to a recipient of humanitarian aid. Mugabe remained in power, proclaiming himself an almost divine ruler and amending the constitution to allow for a lifetime presidency. In 2017, he was ousted from power following a coup. Currently, the white population of Zimbabwe numbers no more than 20,000.

You can read more about the genocide of white people and watch a report on 21st-century Zimbabwe from Russian opposition journalist and vlogger Ilya Varlamov (who has expressed some pro-Ruscist views), who currently lives in the UK.

Nor should we forget the experience of the Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya under Gaddafism, which was defeated in 2014 by the State of Libya (until 2011, simply the Libyan anti-Gaddafi rebels) with the help of an international coalition. Interestingly, during those events, the Gaddafi regime was supported militarily by Lukashist’s Belarus, but an internal conflict arose in Russia – the then-President Dmitry Medvedev (who came to power following the ‘rokirovka’) did not veto the resolution authorising NATO intervention, however, the then Prime Minister Vladimir Putin condemned the NATO invasion and branded it with every possible propaganda cliché, to which Medvedev, who was trying to play the part of a ‘good democratic president and friend of the West’, replied to Putin that he was wrong. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also condemned NATO’s actions. Russian propaganda also engaged in anti-Western propaganda. Following the end of the civil war in Libya, the Russian government and propaganda will continue to pursue anti-Western rhetoric.

Under the Gaddafi regime, a thoroughly racist ideology was espoused towards light-skinned, sub-Saharan inhabitants and black Africans. Indeed, in his ‘Green Book’, he wrote that ‘the black race will prevail’ and ‘the latest age of slavery is the white race’s enslavement of the black race’. In the same text, he wrote that “Black People Will Prevail in the World”, because “Black people will dominate demographically thanks to cultural practices of polygamy and the rejection of contraception, as well as a continuously hot climate where work is less important”. His rule was also based on this ‘Green Book’, in particular the concept of the Third Universal Theory.

Under Gaddafi, the regime pursued a policy of Arabisation, including linguistic pressure on the Amazigh (Berbers), banning their language and culture—which amounted to linguistic genocide. He supported African racist movements, proposed an African currency, invited migrants from sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s, and funded black activists in the US (for example, the racist black supremacist organisation Nation of Islam). At the same time, traditional Arab racism towards dark-skinned people persisted in Libya itself (widespread discrimination against migrants).

Racism against light-skinned people in the Coup Belt and the Alliance of Sahel States

In Nigeria, Islamist groups, including Boko Haram and its offshoot ISWAP (Islamic State West Africa Province), have waged a campaign of terror since 2009 that has disproportionately hit Christian communities. According to the Open Doors World Watch List 2026, of the 4,849 Christians killed for their faith worldwide during the reporting period, 3,490 (72%) were in Nigeria. (Source 1, Source 2)

Boko Haram and ISWAP openly declare their intention to establish an Islamic caliphate and view Christianity as a “Western” threat. They attack churches, schools, villages, kill pastors and believers, kidnap girls (as in the case of Chibok 2014). According to estimates, tens of thousands of Christians have died since 2009, and thousands of churches have been burned.

Fulani militants (armed Muslim herdsmen) are responsible for much of the violence in the Middle Belt (central states). They carry out mass raids on Christian farming villages: they kill, rape, burn houses, seize land. Research by the Observatory for Religious Freedom in Africa (ORFA) shows that the Fulani are responsible for ~47% of civilian deaths in a given period, with a disproportionate focus on Christians (eg 6.2 Christians to 1 Muslim in Fulani attacks). Mass incidents include Christmas Massacres 2023 (over 200 killed in Plateau), Yelwata 2025 (over 150). International organizations (Open Doors, USCIRF, Genocide Watch) record a systematic nature, with elements of “genocide by attrition” — displacement through terror and seizure of territory. (Source 1, Source 2)

In Mali, the jihadist groups JNIM (Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin, linked to al-Qaeda) and ISGS (Islamic State in the Greater Sahara) are expanding their control in the center and south, attacking Christians, burning churches, kidnapping, imposing sharia. Open Doors records the “extreme” level of persecution of Christians. Assimi Goïta’s 2020-2021 coup government claims to be fighting jihadists and separatists, but has been accused of human rights abuses against civilians, including light-skinned citizens, including mass killings in JNIM-controlled areas.

In Burkina Faso, after the Ibrahim Traoré coup (2022), jihadists (including JNIM) continue to attack Christian churches, killing priests and believers. The government is waging a heavy-handed campaign against the Islamists, but Human Rights Watch documents mass killings of civilians (over 1,800 since 2022), including whites, especially ethnic Fulani, whom Traore’s government suspects of supporting the jihadists. Christians suffer both from jihadists and from Traoré’s policies.

In much of Africa, anti-white violence or systemic racism by governments or named groups is a documented practice, sometimes even at the level of genocide. There are isolated incidents of xenophobia, looting or ethnic tension towards light-skinned expats/farmers. The main violence is ethno-religious between local groups (dark-skinned Muslims vs light-skinned Christians/animists, farmers vs herdsmen). Whites are often associated with the “west” used by jihadists and African dictatorial regimes in propaganda.

Strategic conclusions: From the “Clown world” to the real reconquest

Today we have to state the verdict: the theories of the “Great Replacement” and “Black New World Order” have become a partial reality as a result of the systemic betrayal of the world elites. The West is on the way to becoming a “Clown World” where ideological loyalty to the DEI has replaced truth and survival.

Western civilization is in free fall. Data confirm that the “Great Replacement” is not a conspiracy, but a natural result of a combination of demographic suicide and ideological paralysis.

Although, despite all its flaws, there are still political parties and individuals in the world who recognise the immense threat posed by Black and Arab supremacism to civilised nations, such as Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and the ‘Brothers of Italy’ party, or Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and the ‘Liberal Democratic Party of Japan’. Other political forces, however, have typically used these issues merely for their own populist ends; among the most prominent examples are the ‘Fidesz–KDNP Party Alliance’ in Hungary, the Republican Party (Trumpist wing) in the US, Alternative for Germany in Germany, ANO 2011, Freedom and Direct Democracy, and Motorists for Themselves in the Czech Republic, and so on.

The following measures are necessary to restore sovereignty and security:

  • Meritocratic restoration: Immediate elimination of all radical DEI structures, leaving only those with adequate measures, and a return to personnel evaluation based solely on achievements.

  • Racial Reconquest: Reclaiming Ethnosocial Responsibility and Cultural Identity as the Foundation of the State. Rejection of the “colonial guilt” complex, known for the fear of being called a “white racist”.

  • Zero tolerance for radicalism: Total deportation of criminal and ideologically hostile elements without the right of return, regardless of length of stay in the country and status.

The West must abandon ideological illusions in favour of reality. A civilisation that is incapable of protecting its families, its borders and its reason is doomed to disappear. The time for illusions is over. The time for strength has come.

Subscribe now

Sources of information:

  1. ResumeBuilder (2024): 1 in 6 hiring managers have been told to stop hiring white men

  2. UC Davis: Afrocentrism: More Myth Than History, Scholar Says

  3. The Norse Warrior: Highest crime rates among non-European migrants in Norway now even higher

  4. Nordic Times: Musk: White people are a rapidly diminishing minority

  5. The Telegraph (2025): White British minority in 40 years, report claims (також доступно через Web Archive)

  6. City Journal: What’s Holding Blacks Back? (Архівна версія: Web Archive)

  7. UnHerd: Sweden’s migrant rape crisis

  8. Hoover Institution: The Clock Turns Back For Women

  9. The Gateway Pundit: Young white mother killed by BLM mob

  10. WDRB News: Indiana woman shot, killed after argument with BLM supporters

  11. Hindustan Times: Missouri girl brutally assaulted by black student near Hazelwood East school

  12. Modernity News: Family of black girl who beat schoolmate to near death say she’s the real victim

  13. CNN: University of Kentucky student arrested for assault

  14. Bloomberg: Black Lives Matter and corporate diversity

  15. Brookings Institution: The US will become minority white in 2045

  16. Remix News: Germany: Foreigners overrepresented in sexual assaults in Lower Saxony

  17. Sweden Herald: Man sentenced to prison and deportation for rape

  18. Sweden Herald: Court reduces sentences for men convicted of raping 15-year-old

  19. Al Jazeera: Black-Palestinian solidarity: We need to talk about what happened

  20. Overland: From Cronulla to Cologne: it’s the same rhetoric

  21. NY Post: White daughter asked if she was evil after history class (Архівна версія: Web Archive)

  1. Wikipedia: Black supremacy

  2. Wikipedia: 2015–16 New Year’s Eve sexual assaults

  3. Conservapedia: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)

  4. Conservapedia: Black Supremacy

  5. Conservapedia: European migrant crisis

  6. Conservapedia: Great Replacement

  7. Conservapedia: Illegal immigration

  8. Conservapedia: Immigration

  9. Conservapedia: Nation of Islam

  10. Neolurk: Black Lives Matter

  11. Neolurk: DEI

  12. Neolurk: Убийство украинки негром

  13. Neolurk: Race2Dinner

  14. Neolurk: Sexwife

  15. Neolurk: Бойфренд моей жены

  16. Neolurk: Великое Замещение

  17. Neolurk: Джо Байден и нелегальная миграция

  18. Neolurk: Джордж Флойд

  19. Neolurk: Диктатура политкорректности

  20. Neolurk: Импотенция Запада

  21. Neolurk: Инцелизация мужчин

  22. Neolurk: Массовые изнасилования русских женщин и детей мигрантами

  23. Neolurk: Массовые изнасилования британских девочек пакистанскими мигрантами

  24. Neolurk: Мигрантобесие

  25. Neolurk: Негритюд

  26. Neolurk: Ненависть жителей Запада к Западу

  27. Neolurk: Оправдание изнасилований мигрантами

  28. Neolurk: Погром мигрантами и леваками Лос-Анджелеса

  29. Neolurk: Превращение Европы в Сомали

  30. Neolurk: Смешение евреев с арабами и бедуинами

  31. Neolurk: Темнокожая Анна Болейн

  32. Neolurk: Фрипалестинцы громят Европу

  33. Neolurk: Фрипалестинцы

  34. Neolurk: Хоббиты-негры

  35. Neolurk: Чернильница

  36. Neolurk: Чёрные — боги секса

  37. Neolurk: Чернокожие в европейской рекламе

  38. Neolurk: Куколд

  1. Detaly (Детали): Арабский расизм: настало время поговорить и о нем (Архів: Web Archive)

  2. Ksenia Svetlova: Арабский расизм: настало время поговорить

  3. Geworld.ge: В Британии намечается движ

  1. Twitter/X: @EndWokeness — Публікація 1770228635192205786

  2. Twitter/X: @CBHeresy — Публікація 1766994026253721969

  3. Twitter/X: Статус 2002128596241141943

  4. Twitter/X: @WyrzykowskiPS — Публікація 1820382342206091325

  5. Twitter/X: @travelingflying — Публікація 2010782980269359178

  6. Twitter/X: @Kearney9 — Публікація 2010825162694807894

  7. Twitter/X: @libsoftiktok — Публікація 1766982044859478191

  8. Twitter/X: @SouleFacts — Публікація 2009985186063433892

  9. Twitter/X: @ksorbs — Публікація 1820802629032689731

  10. Twitter/X: Grok Share link

  11. Instagram: Reels DPmPXITER-i, DOEYviXjB0V, DOF3NYfCKUd, DQEV_Mrkfva, DTQ_tClDy2E

  12. Reddit: Asylum seeker rape case discussion (Архівні копії: Архів 1, Архів 2)

  13. Reddit: Nigel Farage MP commentary

  14. Reddit: BNWO discussion in Anti_BNWO

  15. Facebook: Group post 1083826076945785

  16. LinkedIn: Steven R. Hill post

  1. LiveJournal: Qebedo — Post 1543551

  2. LiveJournal: el-tolstyh — Post 16098948

  3. Telegram: ChupchikBlog — Дописи 6214, 6215, 6218, 6219

  4. YouTube: Відео HwSWZ6l2eYQ

  5. Archive.ph: Pcidv

  6. Neolurk (Images): Image 1, Image 2

  7. Oxford Academic (British Journal of Criminology): The British Journal of Criminology, Volume 60, Issue 6

  8. arXiv.org (Cornell University): Research Paper 1702.02263 & Research Paper 1810.09869

  9. MDPI (Religions): Scholarly article on religious studies, 2023

  10. Pew Research Center: The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society (2013)

  11. Research Online (University of Notre Dame Australia): Law School Article 17

  12. CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations): Muslim Scholars Speak Out (PDF Report)

  13. Sanjeev Sabhlok City: The Islamic Doctrine Of Women (Reference Material)

  14. Internet Archive: Reliance of the Traveller (Sharia Manual)

  15. Ibn Warraq: Why I Am Not a Muslim (Prometheus Books, 1995).

  16. Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Infidel (2007) & Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now (2015).

  17. Wafa Sultan: A God Who Hates (2009).

  18. Sam Harris: The End of Faith (2004).

  19. Tina Magaard: Textual Studies (often cited in connection with the analysis of Islamic sources).

  20. Le Monde: Jihadists’ rhetoric and the Quran (2025)

  21. Factually.co: Fact-check on mainstream scholars’ views

  22. About Islam: Juristic approach and scholarly criticism of ISIL

  23. Christian Research Institute (Equip.org): Jihad, Jizya, and Just War Theory

  24. WikiIslam: Qur’an, Hadith and Scholars: Offensive Jihad

  25. Neolurk: Андрей Зелев

  26. Neolurk: Small Dick Energy

  27. Neolurk: Big Dick Energy

  28. Neolurk: Cock sucking contest

  29. Neolurk: Политический куколдизм

  30. Neolurk: Куколд

  31. Twitter/X (Grok Shares): Shared conversation e9a4c535... & Shared conversation 3c97698f...

  32. ChatGPT: Shared conversation on specific topics

  33. Hudson Institute: Weaponized Mass Migration: A Security Risk for Europe and the United States (Matt Boyce).

  34. FDD (Foundation for Defense of Democracies) (2026): Weaponized Mass Migration (Date of state of facts: February 10, 2026).

  35. Hoover Institution: The Weaponization Of Migration: A Powerful Instrument In Russia’s Hybrid Toolbox.

  36. Modern War Institute at West Point: Weaponized Migration in Eastern Europe’s Frozen North: Do Not Overlook Russian Hybrid Warfare.

  37. RAND Corporation: Testimony on Weaponized Migration (PDF).

  38. CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies): NATO and Instrumentalized Migration.

  39. Civic Solidarity Platform (2025): Instrumentalisation of migration on the border of Belarus and the EU (PDF) (Kravchuk N., Zakharova О., April 2025).

  40. Cambridge University Press: Nazis in the Middle East: Assessing links between Nazism and Islam.

  41. Friends of Europe: Critical Thinking: ISIL and jihadist terrorism – Not the moment to take our eye off the ball.

  42. SpecialEurasia: Islam, Russia and Terrorism.

  43. AJC Archives: Historical Document/Image Archive (Downloadable File).

  44. Foreign Policy: When It Comes to America’s Race Issues, Russia Is a Bogeyman.

  45. DiVA Portal: Academic work / Dissertation (Fulltext PDF)

  46. SAGE Journals: Academic article on social theory and research (2025).

  47. INSS (The Institute for National Security Studies): Black Antisemitism in the United States (Analysis of security and social aspects).

  48. European Commission (Європейська Комісія): Monitoring and researching antisemitism (Official strategy and policy of the EU).

  49. ENAR (European Network Against Racism): About Antisemitism in Europe.

  50. CST (Community Security Trust): Antisemitic Incidents Report 2025 (Incident Report 2025).

  51. The Guardian (March 27, 2026): It should shame us that Jews live in fear in 21st-century Britain.

  52. The Guardian (April 20, 2026): British Jews feel under siege, worry for their children amid rising antisemitism.

  53. The Jewish Chronicle (The JC): The antisemitic roots of the Great Replacement theory.

  54. Wikipedia: Black nationalism

  55. Wikipedia: Great Replacement conspiracy theory

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What happened in Sakartvelo (Georgia)?

The hybrid dictatorship of the wealthy: How did 8 billion people lose out to 3,000 billionaires?